These two are the main suspects within the whole case. It all fits right. I said previously a man’s DNA was found on JonBenet and a woman wrote the ransom note. They also had the time to write the note and call the police. They are well-educated, and everyone suspects them. Simple, case closed.
As we all know, the world does not work in that way. Simplicity is not common. The only way is solve the case is to look at it from a new angle. Every other solver has looked at it upon the same view, straight on. Now to solve this you have to look at everything. Ask the same questions in a new way.
You have to do something different, to achieve a different result
The police were most likely incompetent within this case. They saw the body in the house, then automatically thought of the parents. Understandable of course yet where was the proof. They did something that betrays everything a detective stands for.
They twisted the facts to suit the theory not twist the theory to suit the facts
The most important way to get a great idea is through interviews. As we cannot interview them in person, we can view them on video sites like YouTube The one that comes to light is the ABC 20/20 interview with both John and Patsy Ramsey. They both answer the questions correctly and do not give anything away. Could they be good at lying? No. If you have seen the programme Lie To Me you will be familiar to the research of Micro-expressions by Paul Ekman. It is very difficult, practically impossible to fake micro-expressions and at 3:48 u this interview once asked whether they would take a lie detector test Patsy answers with a micro-expression of disgust. This is not a bad thing yet positively good. She is disgusted upon the question, she is JonBenet’s mother. A more suitable micro-expression is frightened for the killer. She is upset that people think it was her.
Also the parents do not match the DNA, this is very important. DNA as I have explained previously is very important. If it does not match the parents, or any Ramsey relative, than who abused JonBenet before she was killed thus this also points away from them. This also excludes the brother before anyone decides to pin it on him. Of course he is a suspect yet I will explain why he is innocent later.
The theory of the mother killing JonBenet due to her wetting the bed is an idea put forward by someone who again has changed the facts. Just due to the police and media pinning the initial suspects as the parents, everyone jumps upon that bandwagon. Sometimes people must learn to think outside the box and not believe everything they are told at face-value.
The 911 call which can also be heard on YouTube is very sincere, after hearing it several I must conclude that her vocal patterns are similar to those who are worried, frightened and truthful. How can these two parents pull off such amazing feats in terms of lying to the audience and the police? It’s easy, they cannot.
Finally, they are no signs of any abuse on JonBenet upon any images beforehand. Along with the DNA, phone call, lying ability and the fact neither could have done it due to there physiological profiles, I am concluding that, within my opinion, that they have not committed any crime.